Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com

OAGC - Ohio Association for Gifted Children
614.337.0386
Search:
Advocacy Alerts



Advocacy Update - 9-14-18 - Gifted Performance Results; OAGC HQPD Tools; State Board

2017-2018 Gifted Performance Results– Most of the press on district report cards has centered around district composite grades. As with most other areas, there were gains in gifted performance as well this year. While OAGC needs additional data on ID and service numbers, types of services offered etc. to do a full analysis, we have put together a brief update on the gifted performance indicator results. This brief can be accessed at http://www.oagc.com/files/Brief%20Update%20on%20GPI%20and%20ID%20Service.9.14.18.pdf. The bottom line is that there were gains across all three elements of the gifted performance indicator, and there was an increase in the number of districts meeting the indicator. However, there remain significant differences in performance and performance gains based on district typology. 

OAGC Gifted HQPD Tools – As districts begin to plan for gifted professional development, please be aware that OAGC has put together a number of very helpful resources to assist districts. Please go to www.oagc.com/hqpd.aspfor more information.

State Board to Meet – After a recess for August, the State Board of Education will meet next week. Major issues of discussion will include graduation requirements, the report card and budget. 

Posted: 9/14/2018
Last Update: 9/14/2018

Advocacy Update 8.16.18 - Gifted Rule Update and HQPD Tools; Gifted Cost Study; Gifted Assessments

Gifted Rule Revision – The gifted rule (OAC 3301-51-15) is officially revised. OAGC has been working overtime to develop a new set of recommended plans, assessments, and tools to support districts in implementing the revised gifted operating standards. These include new tools to support AP/IB gifted HQPD and updated and expanded tools to support a four-year plan for general educators. Check out all of our new gifted HQPD tools at www.oagc.com/hqpd.asp. A copy of the new rule can also be found at that link. 

Gifted Cost Study – ODE completed a gifted cost study earlier this summer. OAGC reviewed the study and has developed a response. The study and response could be used in a bi-partisan group studying all aspects of funding. For more information, please go to www.oagc.com/advocacyupdates.asp  and go to the “2018 Gifted Cost Study” topic heading. 

Gifted Assessment Update– As noted in a previous Advocacy Update, ODE has granted a one-year grace period, which allows districts to continue to use current assessments for gifted identification. But a year moves by quickly. OAGC has provided additional information to ODE in an attempt to ensure that constructive progress is made on this issue. 

 

Posted: 8/16/2018
Last Update: 8/16/2018

Advocacy Update – 7.13.18 – Brief Gifted Assessment and Report Card Update

Gifted Assessment Update- As a result of concerns expressed to State Superintendent Paolo DeMaria and members of the State Board of Education, ODE released the following in an email last week: 

"Given the number of concerns raised by districts that already purchased tools for the 2018-2019 school year prior to the release of the new list, the Department will offer a “grace period” for previously approved assessments across all areas covered by the Common RFQ. The Department will allow the use of previously approved assessments for the 2017-2018 school year through June 30, 2019. Districts also can use the newly approved assessments for the 2018-2019 school year. After June 30, 2019, districts can only use the assessments on the new list. The Department will open a new RFQ early this fall for approval of any area without assessments or for vendors that are not on the new list. The new list will be available in March 2019 for use in the 2019-2020 school year."

While OAGC appreciates the one-year grace period, many concerns remain about the list of gifted assessments and the process used to determine the list. OAGC President, Colleen Boyle along with OAGC President-Elect, Suzanne Palmer provided testimony to the State Board of Education this week about our on-going concerns. OAGC will continue to try to work with ODE to ensure that the gifted assessment list will meet the needs of gifted students in Ohio. 

State Report Card Update – The State Board of Education report card working committee released a draft of report card recommendations to the full board this week. The committee plans to meet again in October. The most concerning recommendation for gifted advocates is the one that would eliminate a grade for the indicators component. The indicators component contains the gifted performance indicator, which is the only form of accountability for gifted students. This change would require a change in law. OAGC will continue to monitor any potential changes to the report card including HB591 (Duffey), which did not pass out of the House Education and Career Options Committee before the summer break. 

Posted: 7/13/2018
Last Update: 7/13/2018

Advocacy Alert – 6.27.18 – Newly Released ODE Assessment List is Hugely Problematic for Gifted Identification; SB216 Update

Gifted Assessment List Problems-- The Ohio Department of Education released its list of approved assessments on Monday, June 18. The list is the first time that all assessments in Ohio are consolidated on one list including those for gifted assessment. In fact, the process for compiling the assessments was altered by excluding any outside gifted assessment experts to participate on the workgroup that approved the assessments. OAGC raised concerns about the process several weeks ago to State Superintendent DeMaria and the State Board of Education. Mr. DeMaria indicated in his response that our concerns were unwarranted and the gifted identification process would not be compromised or denigrated. Unfortunately, the new list that was released on Monday has several problems that are hugely problematic for the appropriate screening and identification of gifted students in Ohio.  These issues include the following: 

1.No available assessments for the identification of creativity thinking and visual/performing arts. Not only are there are no assessments, according to the ODE FAQ, districts are not allowed to use the approved assessments from the list from January of 2018 to be used until new assessments are approved. No timeline has been provided for when that might happen. 

2.No available assessments for the identification of students in high school.Again, past instruments that were approved are no longer available to districts. 

3.Very limited assessments approved for individual achievement and cognitive testing. This is highly concerning as it may limit the ability to identified twice-exceptional and other under-represented student populations. Many districts have already purchased these tests that are no longer going to be allowed for use, which causes considerable financial difficult at the district level. 

4.The inclusion of a test for identification which has previously been rejected as it has not been validated using other norm-referenced tests used for gifted identification.In the past, when inappropriate tests were included as identification instruments, students were identified as gifted when it is likely they should not have been. 

5.The broad allowance for use of MAP across all grade levels despite the publisher indicating specific grade alignment to specific versions of the test. AnNWEA representative has verified that the company requested very specific approvals for use of MAP for gifted identification, namely the use of MAP Primary for grades K-1 and MAP 2-5 and 6+ for grades 2 and up.  This is based on their technical data, and to allow the use of MAP Primary for identification in grade 2 may lead to inappropriate identification of students.

6.Inconsistent approval of instruments for pre-screening.Previously, any instrument approved for identification was also approved for pre-screening. However, this list does not permit some instruments to be used for pre-screening, thus inappropriately giving the impression that those approved for both pre-screening and identification are more robust tools.

The solutions to these issues in the short term are relatively simple: 

  1. Allow the use of assessments available on the January, 2018 listof approved gifted assessments be utilized for creative thinking (which is required for whole-grade testing), visual/performing arts, and high school assessment until new assessments can be approved. 
  2. Allow a 12 to 18-month grace period of at least for old assessments to be used so that districts can plan in advance to purchase new assessments. 
  3. Remove the previously rejected assessment now included on the list for gifted identification and return it as a pre-screening tool until the publisher can provide appropriate validation studies. 
  4. Provide specific guidance on test version, grade level use, and qualifying scores as requested by publishers, incompliance with the law, and as reported on past versions of the approved instrument list.
  5. Mark all tools approved for identification as approved for pre-screening.

OAGC President, Dr. Colleen Boyle, communicated our concerns with Mr. DeMaria and the State Board of Education in an email on June 17, 2018. As of today, we have received no response. If this situation will affect your district, you may want to contact your state board of education representative (or all of them). Here is a list of State Board of Education members with their contact information: 

District

Last 

First

Email Address

1

Haycock

Linda

Linda.Haycock@education.ohio.gov

2

Froehlich

Charles

Charles.Froehlich@education.ohio.gov

3

McGuire

Charlotte 

Charlotte.McGuire@education.ohio.gov

4

Bruns

Pat

pat.bruns@education.ohio.gov

5

Woods

Lisa 

Lisa.Woods@education.ohio.gov

6

Miranda

Antoinette

Antoinette.Miranda@education.ohio.gov

7

Fowler

Sarah

sarah.fowler@education.ohio.gov

8

Hollister**

Nancy

nancy.hollister@education.ohio.gov

9

Dodd

Stephanie

stephanie.dodd@education.ohio.gov

10

Owens

Nick

nick.owens@education.ohio.gov

11

Johnson

Meryl

meryl.johnson@education.ohio.gov

At-large

Elshoff*

Tess

ElshoffTess@education.ohio.gov 

At-large

Farmer

Joe

joe.farmer@education.ohio.gov

At-large

Flory

Cathye

cathye.flory@education.ohio.gov

At-large

Kohler

Laura

laura.kohler@education.ohio.gov

At-large

Manchester

Martha

Martha.Manchester@education.ohio.gov

At-large

Poklar

Eric

Eric.Poklar@education.ohio.gov

At-large

Sheppard

James

james.sheppard@education.ohio.gov

*President

     

**Vice President

 

   

If you only want to contact your own state board representative, please refer to the map at the bottom of the following page: http://education.ohio.gov/State-Board/State-Board-Members.

SB216 – Brief Update– SB216 (Huffman), the education deregulation bill, passed out of the House Education and Career Readiness Committee last night and is expected to be passed by the full Ohio House later today. A number of amendments were added to the legislation, including one that incorporates, most of, if not all of HB707, a community school reform bill that was introduced last week and has had no hearings for witness testimony. One very welcome amendment was offered by Rep. Dan Ramos (D) to exclude language requiring students to pay for half of textbooks in College Credit Plus courses. This amendment was accepted unanimously by the committee. Unfortunately, an amendment that would have required only visual and performing arts teachers with a K-12 multi-license to teach in the visual and performing arts areas was tabled, apparently at the request of the Ohio Department of Education. OAGC will do a full review of the bill once it is available in final form. 

 

Posted: 6/27/2018
Last Update: 6/27/2018

Advocacy Update - 5.23.18 - House education bills face uncertain future as Speaker Chaos Continues

The Ohio House and Career Readiness Committee met both yesterday and today. Two pieces of legislation that OAGC is following, HB591 and SB216, had some amendments proposed. But neither bill was voted out of committee. HB591, the report card reform bill will likely be amended to include some elements more favorable to gifted students. However, until the bill can be fully reviewed, it is unclear what the amendments will really do. OAGC will  continue to work with the bill sponsor and others to try to ensure that gifted students are not left unaccounted for in this legislation. The future of this bill is very uncertain as it is late in the year to pass legislation of this magnitude. 

SB216, the education de-regulation bill, also was heard yesterday and today in the House Education and Career Readiness Commitee. While some amendments were taken, the commitee was adjourned before all amendments were discussed. One amendment that is very important is a fix to the N-size which would determine the sub-group size for reporting. The Senate increased the N-size to 30 which would have elminated the information about gifted sub-groups in many schools. It appears the bill will be amended so that the N-size will go down to 15 over a period of three years. It was thought SB216 would be voted out of committee today and voted on by the full House tomorrow. However, all sessions for the House were canceled this week due to the continued drama around the House Speaker vote. It is unclear at this point when the House will convene to elect a new speaker. And until that happens, no bills can be passed in the House. Stay tuned, as the Statehouse Chaos continues to churn. 

 

 

 

Posted: 5/23/2018
Last Update: 5/23/2018